| |

In addition to comparing a money manager's performance
to a standardized index, IPEX also compares an
account's performance to a representative peer group
of money managers that we refer to as a money manager
universe. The selection of a particular universe is
based upon the money manager's investment style, and
will normally correspond with the style specific index
that IPEX has selected as the account's primary
benchmark.
Two steps are involved in presenting universe numbers
for comparison. The first step involves the
construction of the universe. The underlying data is
based upon composite performance numbers submitted by
money managers to a commercial database. From this
data, IPEX constructs a series of universes that
correspond to a generally accepted style matrix.
IPEX begins by examining data on over 1,200 money
managers with over 4,500 investment composites. IPEX
then divides the individual performance composites
into their respective asset classes, e.g., domestic
equity and domestic fixed income. Only money managers
that report their historical investment performance on
a gross total return basis and that have submitted at
least five years of quarterly performance numbers are
included.
Each of the asset class universes is then divided into
more style specific groups. For the domestic equity
managers, an R-squared matrix is used to construct a
series of nine universes that are based upon the money
managers' style and capitalization: large growth,
large core, large value, mid growth, mid core, mid
value, small growth, small core and small value.
In order for a manager to qualify for a particular
universe, its composite investment performance over
the past five years must produce an R-squared
coefficient of at least 80 when measured against a
standardized style index assigned to that particular
category and lower correlation coefficients when
measured against all of the other equity style
indices.
The second step entails calculating the performance of
each universe. IPEX calculates performance by
gathering all of the individual money manager
performance numbers for a particular style universe
and then ranking them from highest to lowest for each
quarter. The 50th percentile performance number is
then labeled as the Manager Universe Median.
|
|
|
|
|
|